On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 14:13, Marc Mutz <marc.mutz@kdab.com> wrote:
On 2020-02-14 14:55, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 13:14, Barry Revzin via SG10
[...]
>> "Improving the Return Value of Erase-Like Algorithms
>> II:Freeerase/eraseif"
>> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p1115r3.pdf
>> This paper suggests no new feature test macro, but affects the return
>> type of some functions introduced by the free erase/erase_if paper,
>> should it bump the __cpp_lib_erase_if macro value?
>
> Hmm, I thought LWG asked for a change to the macro.
>
> I implemented P1115 months ago and bumped our macro to 201900 (i.e.
> not a real value, but greater than the one in the C++20 draft).

The paper asks to adjust the value of __cpp_lib_erase_if in the first
bullet point in the Wording chapter:

> In [version.syn], adjust the value of the ”__cpp_lib_erase_if” macro
> to match the date of application of this paper to the IS draft

I guess that covers it?

Yes, thanks!

I assume Barry did what I did, skip to section 3.1 "Feature test macro" and read that, and assumed there was no change.