On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 6:14 PM Casey Carter <cartec69@gmail.com> wrote:
I suppose I'm saying "it would be nice to have these two distinct feature-test macros, but it may be too late now since __cpp_coroutines has an established history."

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 4:13 PM Casey Carter <cartec69@gmail.com> wrote:
As a rule, it's useful to have distinct macros to indicate compiler and library support of a feature that has both core language and library surface. Standard libraries can then provide the library support / define the library macro only when the necessary compiler support is present. If the feature is unusable without library support, e.g., coroutines, users check only the library macro.


How established? Just #include <coroutine> fails on latest gcc, clang w/libc++, and the latest msvc on godbolt - unless there are extra flags I need to pass in to get this to work on any of them: https://godbolt.org/z/oy9hzc