Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 14:12:03 +0100
Great, will be adjusted for r1.
Thanks,
Alex
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 at 21:03, Jonathan Wakely <cxx_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2025, 20:36 Nevin Liber via SG10, <sg10_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 1:12 PM Alexander Kremer via SG10 <
>> sg10_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear SG10,
>>>
>>> I recently presented this paper (
>>> https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2025/p3798r0.html)
>>> to the BSI panel and was advised to check with SG10 whether we need to add
>>> a feature test macro for the change we are proposing. Please share your
>>> opinion and thank you in advance.
>>>
>>
>> I would expect it to bump up the value of __cpp_lib_expected.
>>
>
> Yes definitely
>
Thanks,
Alex
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 at 21:03, Jonathan Wakely <cxx_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2025, 20:36 Nevin Liber via SG10, <sg10_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 1:12 PM Alexander Kremer via SG10 <
>> sg10_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear SG10,
>>>
>>> I recently presented this paper (
>>> https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2025/p3798r0.html)
>>> to the BSI panel and was advised to check with SG10 whether we need to add
>>> a feature test macro for the change we are proposing. Please share your
>>> opinion and thank you in advance.
>>>
>>
>> I would expect it to bump up the value of __cpp_lib_expected.
>>
>
> Yes definitely
>
Received on 2025-08-01 13:12:16