Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 15:50:57 +0300
Hello SG10,
We're in the process of rebasing C++ on C (we will see a paper today) and
wanted your input on what to do with the C macros:
https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/23
(e.g __STDC_VERSION_STDCKDINT_H__
<https://en.cppreference.com/mwiki/index.php?title=STDC_VERSION_STDCKDINT_H&action=edit&redlink=1>
, __STDC_VERSION_FENV_H__ <https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/numeric/fenv> might
be relevant)
IIUC, we don't port these?
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Standard-Predefined-Macros.html#Standard-Predefined-Macros-1
Should we consider redefining them in the __cplusplus shape?
Best Regards,
Inbal Levi
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*Lead Software Engineer @ Millennium*
Isocpp, Boost &"Hamakor" Non-Profits Board Member
ISO C++ LEWG Chair & Israeli NB Chair
C++Now Program Chair & CoreC++ Conference Organizer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We're in the process of rebasing C++ on C (we will see a paper today) and
wanted your input on what to do with the C macros:
https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/23
(e.g __STDC_VERSION_STDCKDINT_H__
<https://en.cppreference.com/mwiki/index.php?title=STDC_VERSION_STDCKDINT_H&action=edit&redlink=1>
, __STDC_VERSION_FENV_H__ <https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/numeric/fenv> might
be relevant)
IIUC, we don't port these?
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Standard-Predefined-Macros.html#Standard-Predefined-Macros-1
Should we consider redefining them in the __cplusplus shape?
Best Regards,
Inbal Levi
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*Lead Software Engineer @ Millennium*
Isocpp, Boost &"Hamakor" Non-Profits Board Member
ISO C++ LEWG Chair & Israeli NB Chair
C++Now Program Chair & CoreC++ Conference Organizer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Received on 2024-09-17 12:51:16