Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 09:00:12 -0400
An NB comment to fix an issue isn't something to worry about. It's not as
if they're a score. It's a list of things someone things someone thinks
that should be dealt with before release. Apply all P0 issues is probably
going to be there, too.
If we think this is P0, we should probably make that official.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022, 08:09 Thomas Köppe via Lib <lib_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Sept 2022, 12:54 Tim Song, <t.canens.cpp_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> We already have one: https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3750
>>
>
> Ah, great! I'll bow out then, thank you!
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 6:46 AM Thomas Köppe via Lib <lib_at_[hidden]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> OK, thanks! Who's going to file the issue? :-)
>>>
>>> On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 12:28, Ville Voutilainen <
>>> ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 14:17, Thomas Köppe via SG10
>>>> <sg10_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Aha, thanks -- yes, if the macros are normative, then it might indeed
>>>> be best if we resolve this four-fold value bump collision with an LWG issue
>>>> that captures the discussion.
>>>>
>>>> They seem plenty normative to me, or that has least been the intent.
>>>> The standard requires the presence and values
>>>> of a set of macros, and they affect the meaning of portable programs
>>>> written against a particular standard.
>>>>
>>>> Sure, the phrasing in [version.syn]/1, "The header <version> supplies
>>>> implementation-dependent information
>>>> about the C ++ standard library (e.g.,version number and release
>>>> date)." is a bit funny, because there shouldn't
>>>> be anything implementation-dependent about the macros and their
>>>> values. Luckily, "implementation-dependent"
>>>> is not a Term of Power. :)
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lib mailing list
>>> Lib_at_[hidden]
>>> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/lib
>>> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/lib/2022/09/23610.php
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Lib mailing list
> Lib_at_[hidden]
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/lib
> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/lib/2022/09/23612.php
>
if they're a score. It's a list of things someone things someone thinks
that should be dealt with before release. Apply all P0 issues is probably
going to be there, too.
If we think this is P0, we should probably make that official.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022, 08:09 Thomas Köppe via Lib <lib_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Sept 2022, 12:54 Tim Song, <t.canens.cpp_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> We already have one: https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3750
>>
>
> Ah, great! I'll bow out then, thank you!
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 6:46 AM Thomas Köppe via Lib <lib_at_[hidden]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> OK, thanks! Who's going to file the issue? :-)
>>>
>>> On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 12:28, Ville Voutilainen <
>>> ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 14:17, Thomas Köppe via SG10
>>>> <sg10_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Aha, thanks -- yes, if the macros are normative, then it might indeed
>>>> be best if we resolve this four-fold value bump collision with an LWG issue
>>>> that captures the discussion.
>>>>
>>>> They seem plenty normative to me, or that has least been the intent.
>>>> The standard requires the presence and values
>>>> of a set of macros, and they affect the meaning of portable programs
>>>> written against a particular standard.
>>>>
>>>> Sure, the phrasing in [version.syn]/1, "The header <version> supplies
>>>> implementation-dependent information
>>>> about the C ++ standard library (e.g.,version number and release
>>>> date)." is a bit funny, because there shouldn't
>>>> be anything implementation-dependent about the macros and their
>>>> values. Luckily, "implementation-dependent"
>>>> is not a Term of Power. :)
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lib mailing list
>>> Lib_at_[hidden]
>>> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/lib
>>> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/lib/2022/09/23610.php
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Lib mailing list
> Lib_at_[hidden]
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/lib
> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/lib/2022/09/23612.php
>
Received on 2022-09-07 13:00:26