On Thu, Sep 1, 2022, 1:30 PM Mark de Wever <koraq_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Sorry for the late reply, but I wasn't subscribed to this mailing list
> and I wasn't aware there were proposed changes for fix the feature-test
> macro conflicts introduced during the last plenary.
>
> For libc++ combining the feature-test macros for these two papers isn't
> great:
> P2508R1 "Expose std::basic-format-string<charT, Args...>"
> P2419R2 "Clarify handling of encodings in localized formatting of chrono
> types"
>
> P2508R1 is included in libc++15 which should ship this month. (The only
> part I haven't implemented for that paper is the feature-test macro.)
>
> I have started to work on the chrono formatters in libc++ but it will
> take some time before it will be done. Especially since libc++ still
> misses parts of C++20 chono: timezones, leapseconds, and some clocks.
> So it will take some time before I have a look at P2419R2.
>
> I propose to use two separate macros to resolve the conflicts between
> these two papers:
> P2508R1 __cpp_lib_format with the value 202207
> P2419R2 __cpp_lib_format_chrono with the value 202207
>
> Combining the two formatting ranges papers in __cpp_lib_format_ranges
> sounds good to me.
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>

But all the chrono formatting is already included in __cpp_lib_format (by
way of P1361). If libc++ doesn't support that yet, you can't bump that
macro anyway?

Barry

>