Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 18:29:43 -0700
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 4:59 PM Victor Zverovich <victor.zverovich_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> Adding __cpp_lib_format_ranges for P2286 and P2585 sounds like a good idea.
>
> P2508 and P2419 are minor (from the implementation perspective) changes so
> I think just bumping the __cpp_lib_format macro is fine.
>
For the record, I'm willing to accept Victor's expert assertion that these
are both small enough that there's no reason to support separate
implementation and that a single macro bump is good.
>
wrote:
> Adding __cpp_lib_format_ranges for P2286 and P2585 sounds like a good idea.
>
> P2508 and P2419 are minor (from the implementation perspective) changes so
> I think just bumping the __cpp_lib_format macro is fine.
>
For the record, I'm willing to accept Victor's expert assertion that these
are both small enough that there's no reason to support separate
implementation and that a single macro bump is good.
>
Received on 2022-07-26 01:29:56