For context, we recently added more functionality to std::string and we
added:


   - __cpp_lib_string_contains for P1679R3
   - __cpp_lib_string_resize_and_overwrite for P1072R10

Those were nearly two years apart, so it's not like we never do this for
adding members. I don't know what the policy should be though: in this case
there's no __cpp_lib_string that we could have bumped, and I suppose it
would've been weird to introduce it for.. contains()?

Barry

On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 12:05 PM Jonathan Wakely via SG10 <
sg10_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Please see below. LWG is doing a prioritisation poll on this library
> issue. If you have an opinion here, please participate in the thread,
> especially if you feel that the proposed resolution is wrong (otherwise we
> might fast-track it to Tentatively Ready).
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Tim Song via Lib <lib_at_[hidden]>
> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021, 13:46
> Subject: Re: [isocpp-lib] Issue 3621: Remove feature-test macro
> __cpp_lib_monadic_optional
> To: Library Working Group <lib_at_[hidden]>
> Cc: Tim Song <t.canens.cpp_at_[hidden]>
>
>
> Should we ask SG10 to weigh in? I'm not sure we have any guidelines on
> bumping vs new macro.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 8:32 AM Jonathan Wakely via Lib
> <lib_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > It's Monday, so it must be bug prioritization time!
> > Thanks to everyone who participates.
> >
> > https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3621
> >
> > Priority levels:
> > P0 - Has a proposed resolution and that resolution is clearly correct.
> Requires unanimity among the people doing prioritization. Move the issue to
> "Tentatively Ready" or "Ready" (whichever is appropriate for the group
> doing the review); we don't want to spend any more time discussing this
> issue. [Shortened: Approve, and move on.]
> > P1 - Showstopper bug; don't ship a standard w/o resolving this.
> > P2 - Important bug.
> > P3 - Normal bug.
> > P4 - Less important bug.
> >
> > The most common priority should be P3.
> >
> > Please add your comments to this thread.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lib mailing list
> > Lib_at_[hidden]
> > Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/lib
> > Searchable archives: http://lists.isocpp.org/lib/2021/11/index.php
> _______________________________________________
> Lib mailing list
> Lib_at_[hidden]
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/lib
> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/lib/2021/11/20889.php
> --
> SG10 mailing list
> SG10_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10
>