Resending from the right email account....


> We looked at
> https://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21summer2020/LibraryWorkingGroup/d0943r6.html
> in the LWG telecon today. It proposes to add a __cpp_lib_atomic_compat
> macro.
>
> It was pointed out that "compat" is a bit generic and could mean different
> things in different contexts. Should we instead name the macro after the
> header? I think that's our policy when there's no reason to do otherwise.
> It's complicated here by the header being <stdatomic.h> and we can't have a
> dot in a macro name.
>
> Should it be __cpp_lib_stdatomic_h then?
>