Subject: Re: [isocpp-core] Feature-test macro for ADL calls with template arguments?
From: Ville Voutilainen (ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-06-08 18:12:21
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 02:03, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> | > For the configuration of Qt that does not use namespaces, there is no
> | "somewhere"; name lookup just finds it.
> | Sure. And now we want to make it ADL-only, so that it's found only
> | when it's applied to the right thing.
> Which means you have "somewhere"...
...but "somewhere" is not a namespace.
> | Any other questions, before we just add the macro?
> Yes, which document would that apply to?
> The one voted out of Prague, that some compilers are close to declaring conformance to? Or just the SD?
I don't know how SG10 does macro additions that are meant to be
provided by an implementation for a standard
that already got out of the door. The SD is good enough for now;
perhaps the macro addition could be treated
as a DR later.
SG10 list run by email@example.com