Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2019 23:09:54 -0500
Hi SG10 and LWG,
cpplearner points out in https://github.com/BRevzin/sd6/issues/1 that:
"Since unwrap_reference and unwrap_ref_decay are defined in <functional>
([functional.syn]), their feature test macro should also be defined there."
P1902R1 adds this feature test macro in <type_traits> instead. I agree with
them - I think the choice of <type_traits> was my mistake.
Does anybody object to moving it to <functional>?
Assuming no, what should the process of such a change involve? LWG issue?
Barry
cpplearner points out in https://github.com/BRevzin/sd6/issues/1 that:
"Since unwrap_reference and unwrap_ref_decay are defined in <functional>
([functional.syn]), their feature test macro should also be defined there."
P1902R1 adds this feature test macro in <type_traits> instead. I agree with
them - I think the choice of <type_traits> was my mistake.
Does anybody object to moving it to <functional>?
Assuming no, what should the process of such a change involve? LWG issue?
Barry
Received on 2019-11-30 22:12:29