Subject: Re: [SG10] [isocpp-core] P1907R1 should have updated a feature test macro
From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-11-14 02:34:41
On 14/11/2019 01.49, Richard Smith via Core wrote:
> That said... I'm actually more inclined to say we should remove __cpp_nontype_template_parameter_class entirely and just bump __cpp_nontype_template_args. No-one ever fully implemented __cpp_nontype_template_parameter_class as far as I'm aware, and the feature we ended up with isn't class-type-specific (what we have now is "anything fully constant other than non-public subobjects or rvalue references").
SG10 list run by firstname.lastname@example.org