Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:26:35 -0400
Yes, I think we should have one.
John.
> On Sep 14, 2019, at 4:07 PM, Barry Revzin <barry.revzin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019, 2:38 PM Jason Merrill via Core <core_at_[hidden] <mailto:core_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
> This doesn't seem to have been addressed at Cologne. I don't think
> any of the changes at Cologne (conditionally trivial, unconstrained
> TTP, dropping return-type requirements) require a version bump, does
> anyone else?
>
> So I'd stick with the 201811 value.
>
> Jason
>
> Wait, do we even have a __cpp_concepts? We have a __cpp_lib_concepts (... that def needs to be bumped to 201907), but not one for the language. We should add one...
>
> Barry
> _______________________________________________
> Features mailing list
> Features_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
John.
> On Sep 14, 2019, at 4:07 PM, Barry Revzin <barry.revzin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019, 2:38 PM Jason Merrill via Core <core_at_[hidden] <mailto:core_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
> This doesn't seem to have been addressed at Cologne. I don't think
> any of the changes at Cologne (conditionally trivial, unconstrained
> TTP, dropping return-type requirements) require a version bump, does
> anyone else?
>
> So I'd stick with the 201811 value.
>
> Jason
>
> Wait, do we even have a __cpp_concepts? We have a __cpp_lib_concepts (... that def needs to be bumped to 201907), but not one for the language. We should add one...
>
> Barry
> _______________________________________________
> Features mailing list
> Features_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
Received on 2019-09-16 17:26:40