Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 09:39:40 -0400
On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 9:36 PM Richard Smith <richard_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> - <=> != == (should bump both the class nttp macro, and the 3-way comparison macro)
>
> Yes, we should do something about this. Per the above I think we should take a holistic view for <=> feature macros. Bumping the class type NTTP macro makes sense to me. Does any vendor advertise the old value yet?
G++ does.
Jason
>
>> - <=> != == (should bump both the class nttp macro, and the 3-way comparison macro)
>
> Yes, we should do something about this. Per the above I think we should take a holistic view for <=> feature macros. Bumping the class type NTTP macro makes sense to me. Does any vendor advertise the old value yet?
G++ does.
Jason
Received on 2019-09-09 15:45:10