C++ Logo

SG10

Advanced search

Subject: Re: [SG10] SD-6: ready for C++17?
From: Aaron Ballman (aaron_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-11 20:46:41


On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Nelson, Clark <clark.nelson_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I'm getting ready to take silence as assent: that the document is ready to be published as SD-6, and that no one minds if SD-6 differs from P0096R5 in the pre-Albuquerque mailing by (effectively) deleting the editor-notes.

I'm okay with this, thank you Clark!

~Aaron

>
> Clark
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: features-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:features-bounces_at_open-
>> std.org] On Behalf Of Nelson, Clark
>> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 10:41
>> To: features_at_[hidden] <features_at_[hidden]>
>> Subject: Re: [SG10] SD-6: ready for C++17?
>>
>> I have posted another revision:
>>
>> http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21albuquerque/SG10/sd-6.html
>>
>> The only technical changes have to do with P0135R1, but I have also
>> updated the section references from the C++17 table (and reordered a
>> few things to better match the revised section order).
>>
>>
>> I have been assuming that, in the revision of SD-6, the display of
>> editor-notes (at this point consisting almost entirely of indications
>> of missing examples) would be disabled by the style sheet.
>>
>> But I'm somewhat inclined to leave them enabled in the revision in
>> the pre-Albuquerque mailing (i.e. the one that EWG and LEWG will be
>> considering); IOW to tweak the style sheet after the content is
>> captured in the mailing.
>>
>> If you would be concerned about that course of action, please let me
>> know.
>>
>> Clark
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: John Spicer [mailto:jhs_at_[hidden]]
>> > Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 12:58
>> > To: Jonathan Wakely <cxx_at_[hidden]>
>> > Cc: Nelson, Clark <clark.nelson_at_[hidden]>; features_at_isocpp.open-
>> > std.org <features_at_[hidden]>
>> > Subject: Re: [SG10] SD-6: ready for C++17?
>> >
>> > Me too.
>> >
>> > John.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Oct 2, 2017, at 11:45 AM, Jonathan Wakely <cxx_at_[hidden]
>> > <mailto:cxx_at_[hidden]> > wrote:
>> >
>> > Looks good to me.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 29 September 2017 at 01:12, Nelson, Clark
>> > <clark.nelson_at_[hidden] <mailto:clark.nelson_at_[hidden]> > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > The pre-Albuquerque mailing is only about two weeks away,
>> > so I'd better stop sitting on this. Please see:
>> >
>> > http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21albuquerque/SG10/sd-6.html
>> > <http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21albuquerque/SG10/sd-6.html>
>> >
>> > My hope is to publish this as P0096R5 in the mailing, and
>> > then update SD-6 from that, preferably before the meeting (assuming
>> I
>> > hear no objections).
>> >
>> > As always, the change indications are relative to the
>> > published SD-6. To make it easier to review recent technical
>> changes,
>> > the relevant papers are listed below.
>> >
>> > There's one issue I'd like to specifically point out. For
>> > the new features added to the filesystem library, Jonathan
>> suggested
>> > updating the value of __cpp_lib_filesystem to 201703. In what I
>> have
>> > right now, two out of those three features are indicated by a value
>> > of 201606, just because that's the actual date of their adoption,
>> and
>> > only the third is 201703. If there is a consensus that they should
>> > all be lumped together under a single value, I'll change it, but so
>> > far there has been only one comment by one person. (And later it
>> > would be easier for me to erase the distinction than to restore
>> it.)
>> >
>> > Would anyone have any issues with this as a new revision
>> > of SD-6?
>> >
>> > Clark
>> >
>> > N4230
>> > N4366
>> > N4387
>> > N4510
>> > P0024
>> > P0028
>> > P0032
>> > P0040
>> > P0074
>> > P0127
>> > P0220
>> > P0254
>> > P0283
>> > P0295
>> > P0307
>> > P0336
>> > P0371
>> > P0386
>> > P0394
>> > P0618
>> > Transactional Memory
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Features mailing list
>> > Features_at_[hidden] <mailto:Features_at_isocpp.open-
>> > std.org>
>> > http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
>> > <http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Features mailing list
>> > Features_at_[hidden] <mailto:Features_at_isocpp.open-
>> > std.org>
>> > http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Features mailing list
>> Features_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
> _______________________________________________
> Features mailing list
> Features_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features


SG10 list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com