C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [SG10] A feature macro for mandatory copy elision

From: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 07:15:39 +0300
On 6 October 2017 at 02:33, Richard Smith <richard_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> > I can't write
>> > NoCopyNorMove x = factory();
>> > in C++14. It's ill-formed. Same goes for
>> > auto x = factory();
>> >
>> >
>> > The macro does not help you with that. It does not magically make a
>> > C++17
>> > feature appear in C++14 mode.
>> I can avoid compiling that when I know it won't work, for which I can
>> use the macro. I can compile that when I know
>> it'll work, for which the macro tells me that it'll work.
> The thing I'm missing is what alternative you use when the feature is not
> available, and why you would not use that alternative in all cases if you
> want your code to be portable across compilers. Your original example is not
> that, because you can just use the version with
> __cpp_guaranteed_copy_elision not defined, with no loss of functionality.

It's not about loss of functionality, necessary; the C++14 version has
very different design trade-offs:
1) it can only ever be used with factories that are friends
2) it can only ever be used with factories when lifetime-extending
references are used

A probable alternative is to decide that the type is not provided by
the library at all if those trade-offs
aren't palatable.

>> > The choice is that rather than performing tricks with having to
>> > befriend every possible factory function
>> > and forcing users to use lifetime-extending references, such RAII
>> > handles are provided only when copy
>> > elision is available, and otherwise completely different tools need to
>> > be
>> > used.
>> >
>> >
>> > I think we're still missing an example of that.
>> That would be wrapping the whole type in #ifdef
>> __cpp_mandatory_copy_elision, and providing
>> a different type that doesn't rely on copy elision, like a type that
>> is movable and has a different name.
> This sounds promising. Can you give an example?

I can provide two:

#ifdef __cpp_mandatory_copy_elision
class NoCopyNoMove {...};
/* providing this type in C++14 mode is so icky that we simply don't */

#ifdef __cpp_mandatory_copy_elision
class NoCopyNoMove {...};
class NoCopyNoMoveTransitional [[deprecated]] {...};

If copy elision is not available, chances are that there's no reason
to encourage using the alternative
type that has design downsides.

Mandatory copy elision changes what code is valid and what is not. I
find it odd that it's so hard to have a feature
macro for something like that.

Received on 2017-10-06 06:15:42