Subject: Re: [SG10] Filesystem questions
From: Jonathan Wakely (cxx_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-09-06 21:14:34
On 7 September 2017 at 01:23, Nelson, Clark wrote:
> So it looks like the only remaining questions in the C++17 table that we haven't considered yet are what to do about new features in the filesystem library.
> Unless someone on this list comes up with a suggestion, I'll reach out to Beman for ideas on that.
I started writing an email about them after the telecon, but didn't
finish it. I think in theory it's worth having separate macros for
those features , but in practice nobody has shipped a conforming
implementation of __cpp_lib_filesystem == 201603 yet, so having extra
macros for changes to that spec might not be useful. We could just
update __cpp_lib_filesystem to 201703.
If we do want macros, I suggest these names:
SG10 list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com