Subject: Re: [SG10] Over-aligned dynamic allocation
From: Nelson, Clark (clark.nelson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-06-21 23:04:08
> I can imagine that the macro would also be used by people who
> replace the global operator new, and who would also replace the
> aligned version if it were present.
That's a good point. It would also serve to indicate whether
"std::align_val_t" were available as a type name.
Would anyone else like to weigh in in one direction or the other?
SG10 list run by firstname.lastname@example.org