C++ Logo


Advanced search

Subject: Re: [SG10] Over-aligned dynamic allocation
From: Nelson, Clark (clark.nelson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-06-21 23:04:08

> I can imagine that the macro would also be used by people who
> replace the global operator new, and who would also replace the
> aligned version if it were present.

That's a good point. It would also serve to indicate whether
"std::align_val_t" were available as a type name.

Would anyone else like to weigh in in one direction or the other?


SG10 list run by sg10-owner@lists.isocpp.org