C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [SG10] Over-aligned dynamic allocation

From: Nelson, Clark <clark.nelson_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 04:04:08 +0000
> I can imagine that the macro would also be used by people who
> replace the global operator new, and who would also replace the
> aligned version if it were present.

That's a good point. It would also serve to indicate whether
"std::align_val_t" were available as a type name.

Would anyone else like to weigh in in one direction or the other?


Received on 2016-06-22 06:14:36