Subject: Re: [SG10] New draft of Jacksonville additions
From: Nelson, Clark (clark.nelson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-16 12:14:37
> On 03/14/2016 07:19 PM, Nelson, Clark wrote:
> > The only question that doesn't seem to have been settled yet is
> > name of the macro for this-capture. The contenders seem to be:
> > __cpp_capture_this
> > __cpp_capture_star_this
> > Different people have spoken in favor of each. Let the argument
> > in earnest.
> It seems to me that _star_this is clearer, since we could already
> capture 'this'.
Hmm. I was expecting rather more traffic on this topic. In particular,
John seemed to have a distinct preference, with rationale, for the
shorter, simpler name.
Does no one else have a preference?
> I haven't noticed discussion of the enum class change. Perhaps
No, it wasn't discussed on the reflector, but the document does have
my rationale for omitting it. Is it flawed?
SG10 list run by firstname.lastname@example.org