Subject: Re: [SG10] P0272: non-const string data
From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-11 16:02:14
On 03/11/2016 08:08 PM, Nelson, Clark wrote:
> The paper proposing a new overload for string::data didn't propose a
> feature-test macro.
> The first question is, would one be useful for it?
the workaround is something like
(Both const and non-const.)
For someone trying to be backward-compatible, I can't see
why you'd perform an #ifdef dance to be able to write
SG10 list run by email@example.com