Subject: Re: [SG10] Jacksonville additions
From: AgustÃn BergÃ© (agustinberge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-09 19:30:15
On 3/9/2016 10:12 PM, Nelson, Clark wrote:
> I have made a start at the additions we will need to make to SD-6 to reflect
> the JAX meeting; the result is attached.
I'd like to see a feature-test for LWG2296, "std::addressof should be
My use case is similar to that of `optional<T>::operator->`, which is a
constexpr function unless `T` is a user-defined type with overloaded
unary `operator&`. Now that `addressof` is a constexpr function, there's
no longer need for that restriction (I'll submit the corresponding LWG
issue once we have a new draft).
I'd like to be able to provide the same level of constexpr-ness on a
piece of code that still supports C++11:
> I am specifically soliciting comments on everything in the document that
> involves a question mark.
For P0036, "Unary Folds and Empty Parameter Packs", maybe bump
-- Agustín K-ballo Bergé http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com
SG10 list run by email@example.com