On 31 December 2014 at 01:16, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
>>> N4280 - Non-member size() and more: __cpp_lib_nonmember_container_access 201411.
>> OK. I have another question about this one. It mentions that the new
>> declarations are available by including any of an even dozen headers. Does
>> that mean that our recommendations should specify this macro as being
>> defined by all of those headers?
> On second reading I'm not actually sure whether these things go into
> std:: or std::experimental::...
> So should they be pulled into <vector> or <experimental/vector>?

They've been added to the C++17 working paper, not to a TS, so they
are in namespace std and are in <vector> etc. not
<experimental/vector>.