Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 13:20:04 +0100
On 8 October 2014 20:03, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> This looks great. I think we're out of stubs. ;-) If we're feeling bad about that This came out of the 2014-05 fundamentals-ts paper.
> I'm sure there will be more input like this after the meeting. These can wait though: They've appeared in print and thus have had eyes.
>
> Table 2 ? Significant features in this technical specification
> Doc. No. Title Macro Name Value Header
>
> N3925 A sample Proposal __cpp_lib_experimental_sample 201402 <experimental/algorithm>
> N3923 A SFINAE-Friendly iterator_traits __cpp_lib_experimental_iterator_traits_sfinae 201402 <iterator>
> N3843 A SFINAE-Friendly common_type __cpp_lib_experimental_common_type_sfinae 201402 <type_traits>
Weren't these removed from the TS and accepted as DRs against C++14?
> This looks great. I think we're out of stubs. ;-) If we're feeling bad about that This came out of the 2014-05 fundamentals-ts paper.
> I'm sure there will be more input like this after the meeting. These can wait though: They've appeared in print and thus have had eyes.
>
> Table 2 ? Significant features in this technical specification
> Doc. No. Title Macro Name Value Header
>
> N3925 A sample Proposal __cpp_lib_experimental_sample 201402 <experimental/algorithm>
> N3923 A SFINAE-Friendly iterator_traits __cpp_lib_experimental_iterator_traits_sfinae 201402 <iterator>
> N3843 A SFINAE-Friendly common_type __cpp_lib_experimental_common_type_sfinae 201402 <type_traits>
Weren't these removed from the TS and accepted as DRs against C++14?
Received on 2014-10-09 14:20:26