C++ Logo


Advanced search

Subject: Re: [SG10] __has_[cpp_]attribute
From: Stephen Kelly (steveire_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-15 01:56:05

Stephen Kelly wrote:

> Richard Smith wrote:
>> 1) That's a *lot* of macros. We might be able to get away with the cost
>> of
>> the number of macros that SG10 is currently proposing, but I would be
>> *seriously* concerned about a measurable performance cost (on compiling
>> an empty file, which is not actually an irrelevant concern) of
>> predefining hundreds of __has_attribute macros.
>> 2) Either of those identifiers could contain underscores, and there is
>> no
>> other separator character that works.
>> [3) It's ugly.]
> Good points.

Here's something I didn't expect: User libraries defining the __foo macros


Should that be encouraged or discouraged?



SG10 list run by sg10-owner@lists.isocpp.org