C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [SG10] __has_[cpp_]attribute

From: Stephen Kelly <steveire_at_[hidden]>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 23:29:13 +0200
On 06/02/2014 11:10 PM, Nelson, Clark wrote:
>> My understanding falls short in trying to understand the
>> difference in
>> (possible) recommendation of __has_cpp_attribute and the non-
>> recommendation
>> of __has_feature, where recommending it would seem to be
>> consistent. If it's
>> too much, just let me know and I'll stop trying to understand.
> OK, I didn't realize until now that your concern was about the apparent
> inconsistency between not recommending __has_feature and recommending
> __has_[cpp_]attribute.
> Would it be fair to restate your questions as, why are we recommending
> something like __has_attribute when we didn't recommend __has_feature?

Yes, that's a fair restatement of the thoughts motivating my feedback.



Received on 2014-06-02 23:29:17