C++ Logo


Advanced search

[SG10] SD-6 macro name stability.

From: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd_at_[hidden]>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 09:07:40 -0400

I should have asked this earlier but I was wondering based on the most
recent iteration how stable the macro names are?

I know the __cpp_lib_has_* are questionable. But I'd like to know if
the names on the currently posted SD-6 are stable.

I ask because i just posted a patch for gcc that is being reviewed.

I'm going to wait until after the next meeting before I patch for
__has_cpp_attribute and the above macros.



Received on 2014-05-31 16:08:15