"Nelson, Clark" <clark.nelson_at_[hidden]> writes:

| > > Does anybody want to defend the status quo?
| >
| > Not me. Do we need separate __cpp_lib_constexpr_chrono (etc.)
| > macros, then?
|
| My impression is that either we need to go back to that or we need to pick a
| name that we're more confident we won't want to use for some other purpose
| in the future. Or, as Matt suggests, maybe we don't even need a macro for
| this purpose. But going back to header-specific names seems safest to me.
|
| Apparently we changed to what we have now after Bristol. Here is the only
| relevant comment on the Bristol wiki:
|
| Benjamin: Maybe only have one macro __cpp_lib_constexpr, not individual
| macros for each chapter. Do not go sub-modular right now.

I made the same remarks when you asked for feedback.

-- Gaby