C++ Logo

SG10

Advanced search

Subject: Re: [SG10] Draft: ready for the mid-term mailing?
From: W Brown (webrown.cpp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-24 14:42:38


On Jun 24, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Nelson, Clark wrote:

>> I don't like the idea of adding macros for these headers to
>> existing files.
>
> That seems to be the point on which we need to measure consensus on the reflector.
>
> To everyone: If you have an opinion on this point, please express it.

+1 for the __has_include solution, and +1 for only that solution.


SG10 list run by sg10-owner@lists.isocpp.org