Subject: Re: [SG10] __has_include
From: Nelson, Clark (clark.nelson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-19 15:56:41
> I objected that I did not want including <cstddef> to require the
> implementation to perform header search for <optional> and
> (and whatever other headers we add in the future). I would expect
> issuing these file system requests to have a measurable cost.
OK. And you don't think it's practical for <cstddef> just to know the right answer, and unconditionally define either or both of those two macros as appropriate?
SG10 list run by email@example.com