Subject: Re: [SG10] __has_include
From: Nelson, Clark (clark.nelson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-19 15:36:12
On this topic, I remember that Walter suggested defining macros for new headers in <cstddef>, but I don't remember any specific reaction to that idea.
Am I just forgetting, or did it actually slip by without comment?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: features-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:features-bounces_at_open-
> std.org] On Behalf Of Richard Smith
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 12:11 PM
> To: features_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [SG10] __has_include
> Starting with an example, here's how the new C++14 headers could
> detected and used:
> #ifndef __has_include
> #define __has_include(x) 0
> #if __has_include(<optional>)
> #include <optional>
> #if __has_include(<dynarray>)
> #include <dynarray>
> __has_include is a predefined function-like macro.
> __has_include(pp-tokens) expands to 1 if the preprocessing
> #include pp-tokens
> would identify a header or source file (16.2/1). Otherwise, it
> expands to 0.
> Clang's documentation for __has_include is at
> Features mailing list
SG10 list run by email@example.com