On Sun, Aug 23, 2026 at 12:25 AM Jan Schultke via Liaison <liaison@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
When working on a draft of P4444 std::big_int (https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D4444R0.html#std::uint_multiprecision_t), we've stumbled upon the problem that C++ does not yet have a "word type" that would be suitable as the "limb type" for multiprecision.

Given that big int libraries have existed for a while, why is there a pressing need now? 
 
That is, the largest possible unsigned integer type that has native arithmetic support.

What keeps this from suffering the same problems as intmax_t; i.e., once baked into ABIs it is effectively impossible to change when the underlying hardware does.
  
I'm thus interested in standardizing a type alias in <stdint.h> that has the size. In P4444, we call that uint_multiprecision_t, but that's perhaps not universal enough. Names like "uint_maxfast_t" or "uint_word_t" come to mind.

I was never really enamoured with the int_fastN_t types, since they don't guarantee, well, anything other than being at least N bits wide.  This doesn't seem any different, because "fast" isn't clearly defined.

What are your thoughts?

That we are re-inventing int, badly.  The original intention of int was that it be the "fastest" type on the target, whatever that means.

Also, since I'm not in the C committee myself, is there anyone who is interested in championing a proposal on the WG14 side?

I am not interested, and this seems a bit premature.
--
 Nevin ":-)" Liber  <mailto:nevin@cplusplusguy.com>  +1-847-691-1404