5On Wed, 31 Jan 2024, 23:03 Nina Dinka Ranns, <dinka.ranns@googlemail.com> wrote:Apologies, for some reason this email skipped my inbox.The purpose of this meeting is really to get the authors of the two proposals in the same room.Authors, does moving this meeting by an hour prevent you from attending the meeting ?Yes - I'm free for the original time (5-6pm GMT) but not later.Please shout now if that's the case.Thank you,NinaOn Sun, 28 Jan 2024 at 16:22, Tom Honermann <tom@honermann.net> wrote:Hi, Nina.
SG21 (Contracts) is now meeting weekly (up through the Tokyo meeting) and its next meeting overlaps with this one. Is there any chance this meeting could be pushed back by one hour?
Unrelated, I think it would make sense for SG22 to discuss CWG 2836 (Conversion rank of long double and extended floating-point types) (GitHub issue 1699) at a future meeting.
Tom.
On 1/4/24 6:45 AM, Nina Dinka Ranns via Liaison wrote:
Hi all,
we will have an SG22 discussion regarding C and C++ pointer provenance models on Thursday, the 1st of February at 12:00 EDT/17:00 UTC
The purpose of this meeting is to better understand how P2318 and P2434 relate to each other and whether there is a common solution that is suitable for both languages.
Zoom details :
You should be able to join via the link without a passcode. If need be, the passcode is the same as last time : WG14WG21
Please do not publicly share the link as this is an ISO meeting and only open to the ISO members.
Any questions, please let me know.
Best,Nina
_______________________________________________ Liaison mailing list Liaison@lists.isocpp.org Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/liaison Searchable archives: http://lists.isocpp.org/liaison/2024/01/index.php