On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 10:06 AM Timur Doumler via Liaison <liaison@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:


On 6 Oct 2023, at 16:35, Timur Doumler <cpp@timur.audio> wrote:
 So it would be very helpful to have some kind of SG22 poll or decision or record of consensus (or however you do these things!) to say one of three things: "SG22 wants the attribute-like syntax" or "SG22 wants the P296 syntax" or "SG22 is officially undecided".

Sorry, there's a typo: "P296 syntax" -> "P2961 syntax"

 Why would this be helpful?  You think we can't change our minds?  😂

I think the consensus is P2961-like syntax.  Attributes aren't viable for this from a C perspective.

I think spelling out the keywords like Jens suggested is a good idea.  It's 2023, people need to know how to type.

rCs