> I am wondering what new information we got re: $identifiers since the last meeting. I don't think we had a new revision of the paper and I am not aware of SG 16 having discussed it in the interim.

As Jan mentioned, we mostly just ran out of time in SG22. There is a
little bit of new information (we did reach out to some downstreams
and did more digging), but we did not receive permission to share this
information in time for the last paper deadline.

I was considering preparing some slides for the f2f SG22 meeting and
amending the paper afterwards. It will not progress further than SG22
at Búzios anyway (as we are meeting on Friday afternoon) - it's not
yet ready to go back to EWG.


Best regards,
Matthias

On Mon, Nov 2, 2026 at 7:59 PM Peter Bindels via Liaison
<liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, November 2nd, 2026 at 6:00 PM, Hubert Tong via Liaison <liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I am wondering what new information we got re: $identifiers since the last meeting. I don't think we had a new revision of the paper and I am not aware of SG 16 having discussed it in the interim.
>
>
> There was nothing for SG16 to discuss in the current revision so it was not planned. I have had communication from Matthias that there might be some future discussion desired in SG16 about a part of the paper. The discussion in SG22 was, if I understood correctly, part of the input to that. I've asked him to let me know if we should schedule it, and so far he hasn't requested that.
> _______________________________________________
> Liaison mailing list
> Liaison_at_[hidden]
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/liaison
> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/liaison/2026/11/1711.php