I am wondering what new information we got re: $identifiers since the last
meeting. I don't think we had a new revision of the paper and I am not
aware of SG 16 having discussed it in the interim.

-- HT

On Mon, Nov 2, 2026 at 11:31 AM Timur Doumler <cpp_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Sure, it's these two papers:
>
> P4234R0 <https://wg21.link/p4234r0> $identifiers (Matthias Wippich, Murat
> Can Çağrı)
> P4378R0 <https://wg21.link/p4378r0> Align exact-width integer types with
> C (Murat Can Çağrı)
>
> Cheers,
> Timur
>
> On 2 Nov 2026, at 16:21, Hubert Tong <hubert.reinterpretcast_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
> @Timur Doumler <cpp_at_[hidden]>
>
> You mentioned on the WG 21 admin telecon that you have two papers
> scheduled for this meeting. Can you please let me know what they are? As WG
> 21 will still be in session, I will not be able to attend unless CWG ends
> their session early.
>
> -- HT
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 9:24 AM Timur Doumler via Liaison <
> liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Hello SG22,
>>
>> As it so happens, the next WG21 meeting in Búzios, Brazil (16-21 November
>> 2026) is co-located with a WG14 meeting which will be at the same place
>> during the same week. This gives us, the C/C++ Liaison Group, the unique
>> opportunity to have an SG22 meeting in person (or rather, hybrid: in person
>> + zoom).
>>
>> I have consulted with both the WG21 convenor (Guy Davidson) and the WG14
>> convenor (Robert Seacord) and turns out that such a meeting is feasible
>> both logistically and procedurally. However, the only possible time slot
>> for this is *Friday 20 November 2026 in the afternoon* (exact time to be
>> confirmed), Búzios local time (UTC-3). This is because WG14 is planning to
>> wrap up proceedings by Friday lunch time and will therefore no longer be in
>> session Friday afternoon.
>>
>> Another slight procedural complication is that WG21 *will* still be
>> formally in session on Friday afternoon, so this hybrid SG22 meeting would
>> have to be considered part of WG21's formal proceedings and therefore
>> anyone attending – whether in person or on zoom – will have to either be an
>> accredited WG21 expert (i.e., listed on the ISO Global Directory for WG21)
>> or else obtain a formal invitation from the WG21 convenor to attend as a
>> guest. This is not an insurmountable obstacle, and in fact Guy told me that
>> he's happy to grant such a guest invitation to anyone interested in
>> attending such a hybrid SG22 meeting in Búzios. He just needs to know
>> people's names, e-mail addresses, and national bodies sufficiently far in
>> advance so he can notify ISO accordingly, and I can even batch-forward him
>> that list to streamline this process.
>>
>> Before we proceed with organising all this, I'd like to gauge the
>> appetite of this group for actually having this meeting and whether it's
>> worth the effort. Therefore, could you all *please reply to this email *(you
>> can do so privately to me, no need to reply to the whole mailing list) and* answer
>> the following questions:*
>>
>> Q1. Are you interested in attending such a hybrid SG22 meeting at the
>> specified time?
>> Q2. If your reply to Q1 is yes: would you be attending in person in
>> Búzios, Brazil, or remotely via Zoom?
>> Q3. If your reply to Q1 is yes: are you listed on the ISO Global
>> Directory for *WG21* (whether you are listed for WG14 is irrelevant)?
>> Q4. If your reply to Q3 is no: what is your national body, and do you
>> consent to me forwarding your name, e-mail address, and national body to
>> the WG21 convenor for the purposes of obtaining a guest invitation?
>>
>> Please feel free to share any questions, suggestions, or concerns
>> regarding this idea.
>>
>> I believe that it is worthwhile organising such an SG22 meeting in
>> Búzios. I would be very excited to meet (at least a subset of) you in
>> person, and I believe having some in-person meeting time would benefit the
>> group dynamics in SG22, and thus our collective technical work, going
>> forward. This is a unique opportunity which we might not get again.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Timur
>> _______________________________________________
>> Liaison mailing list
>> Liaison_at_[hidden]
>> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/liaison
>> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/liaison/2026/08/1687.php
>>
>
>