C++ Logo

liaison

Advanced search

Re: [isocpp-wg14/wg21-liaison] SG22 Telecon 2026-07, updates from Brno

From: Hubert Tong <hubert.reinterpretcast_at_[hidden]>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 16:14:55 -0400
With the understanding that $identifiers is not on the agenda, I'll sit the
upcoming meeting out.

-- HT

On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 5:52 AM Jan Schultke via Liaison <
liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> *https://rallly.co/invite/7XvCIZTXM5PM
> <https://rallly.co/invite/7XvCIZTXM5PM> Please participate in this poll
> (especially the authors) for the date and time of the next SG22 (WG14/WG21
> Liaison) telecon in July.* Note that doodle has made their polls a
> premium feature, so we're forced to switch to another (similar service).
>
> On the agenda, we have:
>
> - P3290R4
> <https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2026/p3290r4.pdf> Integrating
> Existing Assertions with Contracts (Joshua Berne, Timur Doumler, John Lakos)
> - P3093R0
> <https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2024/p3093r0.html> Attributes
> on expressions (Giuseppe D'Angelo)
>
> Furthermore, a notable development from Brno is that P3568R2 (break label;
> and continue label;) was forwarded from EWG to CWG (see Issue #2212 ·
> cplusplus/papers <https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/2212>) for
> inclusion in C++29. The paper notably assumes that in WG14, N3658
> <https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3658.htm> will make
> further progress. The C++ design is identical to the C2y design, with the
> relaxed semantics from N3658 implemented. P3568R2 should still be seen by
> SG22 during a subsequent telecon, but you should be aware that this is
> ongoing. It is very important to members of the C++ committee that the C
> and C++ features remain aligned.
>
> Also, EWG voted in favor of D4234R1 Wording Option 1
> <https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D4234R1.html#wording-option-1> (see Issue
> #2792 · cplusplus/papers <https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/2792>) ,
> which would make dollar signs in identifiers an optional feature. We will
> also see this paper in a subsequent telecon. The paper has not yet been
> forwarded for inclusion in C++29.
>
>
> Yours
> Jan Schultke
> _______________________________________________
> Liaison mailing list
> Liaison_at_[hidden]
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/liaison
> Searchable archives: http://lists.isocpp.org/liaison/2026/06/index.php
>

Received on 2026-06-26 20:15:28