C++ Logo

liaison

Advanced search

Re: [isocpp-wg14/wg21-liaison] Question re: P0085R3: Oo... adding a coherent character sequence to begin octal-literals

From: Corentin <corentin.jabot_at_[hidden]>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 16:39:27 +0200
It was also mentioned that for implementers - at least for clang - the
timeframe for removal in compilers would realistically be measured in
decades.

On Thu, May 7, 2026 at 4:33 PM Jan Schultke via Liaison <
liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> As I remember it, the timeline for removal of the feature was not brought
> up during the meeting. The minutes also don't record that.
>
> The focus of the deprecation discussion was which of 01 and 001 would be
> deprecated, with the goal to align the C and C++ deprecations to ensure
> compatibility.
>
> On Thu, 7 May 2026 at 16:13, Hubert Tong via Liaison <
> liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> With respect to the deprecation of multi-digit octal literals using the
>> plain 0 suffix, there is a culture (in WG 21) of expecting that deprecation
>> leads to eventual removal. Was that clear in the discussion in April (
>> https://github.com/sg22-c-cpp-standard-compatibility/sg-compatibility/blob/main/meetings/2026-04-24.md
>> )?
>>
>> -- HT
>> _______________________________________________
>> Liaison mailing list
>> Liaison_at_[hidden]
>> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/liaison
>> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/liaison/2026/05/1645.php
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Liaison mailing list
> Liaison_at_[hidden]
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/liaison
> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/liaison/2026/05/1646.php
>

Received on 2026-05-07 14:39:52