Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 13:58:26 +0200
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 1:47 PM Aaron Ballman via Liaison <
liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 7:24 AM Robert Seacord via Liaison
> <liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > I cannot think of any reasons why this paper would cause any C/C++
> compatibility issues.
>
> Aside from it meaning these C interfaces are mandatory in C++ but
> optional in C. ;-)
>
Which is not a compatibility concern afaict (though the reverse would be)
>
> This topic came up in WG14 as part of
> https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2889.htm and that
> paper was rejected because of concerns from several implementers. One
> of the concerns I recall was around implementations supporting very
> wide pointer types, such as capability-based memory architectures.
>
I think WG21 can decide independently whether it want to restrict the
compatible set of hardware more than C does
(As an aside, while I understand there are platforms where uintptr would
need to be bigger than sizeof(void*)... that's allowed!
It's what CHERI seem to be doing
https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/techreports/UCAM-CL-TR-947.pdf )
> ~Aaron
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > rCs
> >
> > On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 6:17 AM Nina Dinka Ranns via Liaison <
> liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> We have a question from the author of P3248R0 Require [u]intptr_t :
> >>
> >> - If C++ requires [u]intptr_t with the proposed semantics (same as C),
> does SG22 have any concerns w.r.t. C++ compatibility with C on platforms
> C++ supports?
> >>
> >> Thoughts ?
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> Nina
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Liaison mailing list
> >> Liaison_at_[hidden]
> >> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/liaison
> >> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/liaison/2024/05/1408.php
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Liaison mailing list
> > Liaison_at_[hidden]
> > Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/liaison
> > Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/liaison/2024/05/1410.php
> _______________________________________________
> Liaison mailing list
> Liaison_at_[hidden]
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/liaison
> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/liaison/2024/05/1411.php
>
liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 7:24 AM Robert Seacord via Liaison
> <liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > I cannot think of any reasons why this paper would cause any C/C++
> compatibility issues.
>
> Aside from it meaning these C interfaces are mandatory in C++ but
> optional in C. ;-)
>
Which is not a compatibility concern afaict (though the reverse would be)
>
> This topic came up in WG14 as part of
> https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2889.htm and that
> paper was rejected because of concerns from several implementers. One
> of the concerns I recall was around implementations supporting very
> wide pointer types, such as capability-based memory architectures.
>
I think WG21 can decide independently whether it want to restrict the
compatible set of hardware more than C does
(As an aside, while I understand there are platforms where uintptr would
need to be bigger than sizeof(void*)... that's allowed!
It's what CHERI seem to be doing
https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/techreports/UCAM-CL-TR-947.pdf )
> ~Aaron
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > rCs
> >
> > On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 6:17 AM Nina Dinka Ranns via Liaison <
> liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> We have a question from the author of P3248R0 Require [u]intptr_t :
> >>
> >> - If C++ requires [u]intptr_t with the proposed semantics (same as C),
> does SG22 have any concerns w.r.t. C++ compatibility with C on platforms
> C++ supports?
> >>
> >> Thoughts ?
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> Nina
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Liaison mailing list
> >> Liaison_at_[hidden]
> >> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/liaison
> >> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/liaison/2024/05/1408.php
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Liaison mailing list
> > Liaison_at_[hidden]
> > Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/liaison
> > Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/liaison/2024/05/1410.php
> _______________________________________________
> Liaison mailing list
> Liaison_at_[hidden]
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/liaison
> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/liaison/2024/05/1411.php
>
Received on 2024-05-23 11:58:45