Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 15:24:21 +0100
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 at 15:16, Jāāā Gustedt via Liaison <
liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Aaron,
> clang could also promote the existing `__builtin_unreachable` to the
> `std` namespace or have an alias of that name, there. Though I don't
> know if such a thing is politically admissible ;-)
>
C++ already has std::unreachable(), so no need for the built-in name.
liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Aaron,
> clang could also promote the existing `__builtin_unreachable` to the
> `std` namespace or have an alias of that name, there. Though I don't
> know if such a thing is politically admissible ;-)
>
C++ already has std::unreachable(), so no need for the built-in name.
Received on 2024-04-04 14:25:41