Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 20:33:01 +0300
Dear WG14/WG21 liaison study group,
At our SG21 (Contracts) telecon tomorrow we will be looking at P2885 "Requirements for a Contracts syntax" <https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2023/p2885r0.pdf>. One of the questions that this paper asks, and that we intend to poll, is (see section 5.8 on page 11):
"Should the Contracts syntax also be standardisable for the C programming language? Note that this might be a subset of the syntax adopted by WG21, or an alternative spelling for the same constructs that is supported by both languages."
If any of you would like to contribute to this discussion, you're very welcome to join. Apologies for the short notice.
The telecon is taking place tomorrow – Thursday, 27 July 2023, at 15:00 UTC (8 AM Pacific / 11 AM Eastern / 16:00 BST / 17:00 CEST). That's 21h 30mins from now. Agenda and Zoom link can be found on the wiki page: https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2023/Teleconference2023-07-27
Cheers,
Timur
At our SG21 (Contracts) telecon tomorrow we will be looking at P2885 "Requirements for a Contracts syntax" <https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2023/p2885r0.pdf>. One of the questions that this paper asks, and that we intend to poll, is (see section 5.8 on page 11):
"Should the Contracts syntax also be standardisable for the C programming language? Note that this might be a subset of the syntax adopted by WG21, or an alternative spelling for the same constructs that is supported by both languages."
If any of you would like to contribute to this discussion, you're very welcome to join. Apologies for the short notice.
The telecon is taking place tomorrow – Thursday, 27 July 2023, at 15:00 UTC (8 AM Pacific / 11 AM Eastern / 16:00 BST / 17:00 CEST). That's 21h 30mins from now. Agenda and Zoom link can be found on the wiki page: https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2023/Teleconference2023-07-27
Cheers,
Timur
Received on 2023-07-26 17:33:04