Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 13:56:37 -0400
Our next meeting will be on Fri May 6, 2022 at 15:00 UTC
(https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20220506T150000&p1=tz_pt&p2=tz_mt&p3=tz_ct&p4=tz_et&p5=1440).
You can join the meeting at https://iso.zoom.us/j/5513145100
We will be discussing the following papers:
WG14 N2888 (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2888.htm)
Require exact-width integer type interfaces
Proposes changes to the definition of the intmax_t and uintmax_t
typedefs so that extended exact-width integer types do not factor into
the definition. Thus, these types are required to be large enough to
represent a `long long` type, but do not have to be widened for an
implementation to support e.g., __int128 as an extended integer type.
The author is looking for feedback on whether this approach will be a
palatable way forward given the ABI concerns around changing the size
or alignment of these types.
WG14 N2889 (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2889.htm)
Pointers and integer types
Proposes making intptr_t and uinptr_t mandatory types instead of
optional. The author is looking for feedback on whether there will be
any difficulties with this change.
Thanks!
~Aaron
(https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20220506T150000&p1=tz_pt&p2=tz_mt&p3=tz_ct&p4=tz_et&p5=1440).
You can join the meeting at https://iso.zoom.us/j/5513145100
We will be discussing the following papers:
WG14 N2888 (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2888.htm)
Require exact-width integer type interfaces
Proposes changes to the definition of the intmax_t and uintmax_t
typedefs so that extended exact-width integer types do not factor into
the definition. Thus, these types are required to be large enough to
represent a `long long` type, but do not have to be widened for an
implementation to support e.g., __int128 as an extended integer type.
The author is looking for feedback on whether this approach will be a
palatable way forward given the ABI concerns around changing the size
or alignment of these types.
WG14 N2889 (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2889.htm)
Pointers and integer types
Proposes making intptr_t and uinptr_t mandatory types instead of
optional. The author is looking for feedback on whether there will be
any difficulties with this change.
Thanks!
~Aaron
Received on 2022-04-25 17:56:50