On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 9:07 AM Timur Doumler via Liaison
<liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Are the poll results and/or minutes from the 11 Feb 2022 meeting accessible somewhere?

Yup! You can find the minutes either on the WG21 wiki at
https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2022/Teleconference2022-02-11
or on the WG14 document log at
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2933.pdf

~Aaron

>
> Thanks,
> Timur
>
> > On 11 Feb 2022, at 13:00, Aaron Ballman <compatibility.sg.chair_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > As a reminder, we'll be having our C and C++ Compatibility study group
> > meeting today, in about five hours from now. I hope to see you there!
> > The full agenda and meeting info are:
> >
> > Our next meeting will be on Fri Feb 11, 2022 at 18:00 UTC
> > (https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20220211T180000&p1=tz_pt&p2=tz_mt&p3=tz_ct&p4=tz_et&p5=1440).
> >
> > You can join the meeting at https://iso.zoom.us/j/5513145100
> >
> > **NEW PASSWORD: same as the old one, but spelled as a C reserved
> > identifier instead of a C++ keyword; contact Aaron Ballman if you have
> > questions **
> >
> > We will be discussing the following papers:
> >
> > P1774R5 (https://wg21.link/P1774R5) Portable assumptions
> > Proposes adding a new attribute (spelled [[assume(...)]]) to give
> > programmers a portable way to provide information to an optimizing
> > compiler that an expression is true without the compiler executing the
> > expression. The author is looking for feedback on whether this
> > proposal would be of interest to WG14 for inclusion in a revision of C
> > and, if so, whether any modifications are needed to the existing C++
> > proposal.
> >
> > P2478R0 (https://wg21.link/P2478R0) _Thread_local for better C++
> > interoperability with C
> > Continues the discussion about semantic differences between
> > _Thread_local (C) and thread_local (C++) that was first identified
> > during discussion of P2310R0 Revise spelling of keywords at the
> > November 2021 SG22 meeting. The authors wish to report back on the
> > discussions that happened in WG14 and see if there is SG22 appetite
> > for C++ changes to improve compatibility in this realm.
> >
> > WG14 N2919 (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2919.pdf)
> > Relax requirements for variadic parameter lists
> > This paper proposes allowing a function signature consisting solely of
> > an ellipsis in C (e.g., void foo(...);) and changes the va_start macro
> > so that its second argument is optional and never evaluated (only the
> > first parameter is used). The author is looking for feedback on
> > whether this proposal will cause compatibility concerns, as WG14 is
> > intending to add this feature to C23.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > ~Aaron
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:54 AM Aaron Ballman
> > <compatibility.sg.chair_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Our next meeting will be on Fri Feb 11, 2022 at 18:00 UTC
> >> (https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20220211T180000&p1=tz_pt&p2=tz_mt&p3=tz_ct&p4=tz_et&p5=1440).
> >>
> >> You can join the meeting at https://iso.zoom.us/j/5513145100
> >>
> >> **NEW PASSWORD: same as the old one, but spelled as a C reserved
> >> identifier instead of a C++ keyword; contact Aaron Ballman if you have
> >> questions **
> >>
> >> We will be discussing the following papers:
> >>
> >> P1774R5 (https://wg21.link/P1774R5) Portable assumptions
> >> Proposes adding a new attribute (spelled [[assume(...)]]) to give
> >> programmers a portable way to provide information to an optimizing
> >> compiler that an expression is true without the compiler executing the
> >> expression. The author is looking for feedback on whether this
> >> proposal would be of interest to WG14 for inclusion in a revision of C
> >> and, if so, whether any modifications are needed to the existing C++
> >> proposal.
> >>
> >> P2478R0 (https://wg21.link/P2478R0) _Thread_local for better C++
> >> interoperability with C
> >> Continues the discussion about semantic differences between
> >> _Thread_local (C) and thread_local (C++) that was first identified
> >> during discussion of P2310R0 Revise spelling of keywords at the
> >> November 2021 SG22 meeting. The authors wish to report back on the
> >> discussions that happened in WG14 and see if there is SG22 appetite
> >> for C++ changes to improve compatibility in this realm.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> ~Aaron
>
> _______________________________________________
> Liaison mailing list
> Liaison_at_[hidden]
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/liaison
> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/liaison/2022/02/0993.php