Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 16:04:51 -0500
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 3:09 PM Aaron Ballman via Liaison <
liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> JeanHeyd has a draft paper in the works for the required changes to C++,
> which
> will help ensure we don't forget to unify the two definitions.
>
Here it is: https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D2537R0.html
The changes look pretty simple for C++. We don't even have to go through
the same gymnastics that C does, because we have __VA_OPT__ and can handle
0-sized __VA_ARGS__ lists well, unlike C. (Thomas Köppe has a paper to fix
that, eventually, in C. We might see it during this WG14 meeting when it
resumes the week after next.)
Sincerely,
JeanHeyd
liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> JeanHeyd has a draft paper in the works for the required changes to C++,
> which
> will help ensure we don't forget to unify the two definitions.
>
Here it is: https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D2537R0.html
The changes look pretty simple for C++. We don't even have to go through
the same gymnastics that C does, because we have __VA_OPT__ and can handle
0-sized __VA_ARGS__ lists well, unlike C. (Thomas Köppe has a paper to fix
that, eventually, in C. We might see it during this WG14 meeting when it
resumes the week after next.)
Sincerely,
JeanHeyd
Received on 2022-02-04 21:05:06