On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 23:19, Aaron Ballman <aaron_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> <chair hat>
> I'd like to redirect our energy away from trying to guess what
> (most/many/all/etc) users do or don't do (no one knows this well
> enough to make meaningful assertions, generally) and back towards
> providing actionable feedback for the paper author on how to modify
> their paper in order to strengthen consensus. Thanks!
> </chair hat>

Thanks, sorry for getting carried away. This is, after all, rather simple:

1) consensus on adopting this proposal increases manyfold from my
constituents' part if the identifier-less form is removed from the
proposal.
2) dropping the proposal altogether has, by definition, 100%
consensus. That would be the best outcome I can find
for other reasons, too, but especially when we start thinking about
where we should direct our energy.