It was just a list of papers for WG14 authored by myself,
not a list of all papers relevant to to this group.

Your paper is already on the agenda of this study group.

Best,
Martin

Am Sonntag, den 14.02.2021, 10:23 +0100 schrieb Peter C++:
> I am not sure it is intended, it misses my combined wg21/14 paper on assert...:-)
>
> sent from a mobile device so please excuse strange words due to autocorrection.
> Peter Sommerlad
> peter.cpp_at_sommerlad.ch
> +41-79-432 23 32
>
> > On 14 Feb 2021, at 09:23, Uecker, Martin via Liaison <liaison_at_lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > Here is a list of my recent papers for WG14 and
> > how they might affect C++.
> >
> > Best,
> > Martin
> >
> >
> >
> > N2663 Lifetime, Blocks, and Labels
> >
> > This is about fixing a minor unintended side effect
> > of the recent label change. Probably, not relevant
> > to C++.
> >
> > (BTW: There is still the issue about labels at end of
> > compound statements C++ may want to add as well.)
> >
> >
> > N2662 maybe_unused attribute for labels
> >
> > This proposed to add labels to the list of things
> > the maybe_unused attribute can be applied to.
> > This is something C++ may also want to do.
> >
> >
> > N2661 nested functions
> >
> > I like regular nested functions because they
> > are so simple, useful, and perfectly integrate with C.
> > So here is my proposal. I always wondered why C++
> > directly added anonymous nested functions (i.e. lambda
> > expressions) which are a much more complicated version
> > of nested functions but not also regular nested
> > functions.
> >
> >
> > N2660 improved bounds checking for array types
> >
> > This is a collection of proposal to better integrate
> > array types in C and fix some edge cases. The
> > proposals are not very concrete in this document
> > (although many were proposed before). It is just
> > a summary of what could be done for C23.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Liaison mailing list
> > Liaison_at_[hidden]rg
> > Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/liaison
> > Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/liaison/2021/02/0335.php