On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 1:13 AM Jens Gustedt via Liaison <
liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> J,
>
>
> But we are much taken away. To come back to the original paper, what I
> was saying that it would be better to formulate the replacement rule
> that is proposed to be `X.member` should rewrite to `X→member` if `X`
> is a pointer. That's all.
>
https://gist.github.com/d3x0r/a574459e4ad18ea1e10a2367b06bd257#c-standards-proposal
added footnote note?


>
> (And I still don't like it.) :)
>
> Thanks
> Jens
>
> --
> :: INRIA Nancy Grand Est ::: Camus ::::::: ICube/ICPS :::
> :: ::::::::::::::: office Strasbourg : +33 368854536 ::
> :: :::::::::::::::::::::: gsm France : +33 651400183 ::
> :: ::::::::::::::: gsm international : +49 15737185122 ::
> :: http://icube-icps.unistra.fr/index.php/Jens_Gustedt ::
> _______________________________________________
> Liaison mailing list
> Liaison_at_[hidden]
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/liaison
> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/liaison/2020/03/0065.php
>