std-discussion

Interpretation of __VA_OPT__ Edward Diener (2019-10-31 21:27:15)

A contradiction in the description of the enclosed namespace Vladimir Grigoriev (2019-10-25 11:33:55)

Extending a namespace in an inline namespace that initially was defined in the enclosing namespace of the inline namespace Vladimir Grigoriev (2019-10-23 18:11:47)

• Re: Extending a namespace in an inline namespace that initially was defined in the enclosing namespace of the inline namespace Brian Bi (2019-10-24 22:53:47)
  • Re: Extending a namespace in an inline namespace that initially was defined in the enclosing namespace of the inline namespace Krystian Stasiowski (2019-10-24 23:53:42)

Destruction order of statically-initialized objects (like std::mutex) Kevin Bracey (2019-10-23 16:58:50)

• Re: Destruction order of statically-initialized objects (like std::mutex) Thiago Macieira (2019-10-24 06:04:47)
  • Re: Destruction order of statically-initialized objects (like std::mutex) Kevin Bracey (2019-10-24 08:02:34)
    • Re: Destruction order of statically-initialized objects (like std::mutex) Thiago Macieira (2019-10-24 20:02:11)

Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Giuseppe D'Angelo (2019-10-21 07:38:24)

• Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Jeremy Ong (2019-10-21 07:44:24)
  • Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Thiago Macieira (2019-10-21 15:36:53)
    • Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Andrey Semashev (2019-10-21 17:33:02)
      • Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Michael Spencer (2019-10-21 18:33:57)
        • Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Michael Spencer (2019-10-21 19:54:03)
      • Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Thiago Macieira (2019-10-22 05:05:32)
        • Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Andrey Semashev (2019-10-22 07:14:52)
          • Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Thiago Macieira (2019-10-22 15:00:20)
            • Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Andrey Semashev (2019-10-22 15:14:18)
            • Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Thiago Macieira (2019-10-22 15:52:37)
    • Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Ryan Nicholl (2019-10-21 18:41:43)

Seeking a better constexpr Jeremy Ong (2019-10-14 04:57:40)

• Re: Seeking a better constexpr Andrew Schepler (2019-10-14 12:09:49)
  • Re: Seeking a better constexpr Jeremy Ong (2019-10-14 15:19:30)
• Re: Seeking a better constexpr Michael Spencer (2019-10-14 18:10:57)

Re: Lifetime of references Krystian Stasiowski (2019-10-11 16:38:29)

• Re: Lifetime of references language.lawyer_at (2019-10-11 21:26:01)

Lifetime of references language.lawyer_at (2019-10-11 16:33:30)

std::valarray<T>::resize Vladimir Grigoriev (2019-10-11 11:42:23)

Re: Does [expr.call]/1 correctly authorize the snippet below to compile? Krystian Stasiowski (2019-10-10 14:25:22)

• Re: Does [expr.call]/1 correctly authorize the snippet below to compile? Jason Cobb (2019-10-10 14:49:39)
• Re: Does [expr.call]/1 correctly authorize the snippet below to compile? Krystian Stasiowski (2019-10-10 15:12:28)
  • Re: Does [expr.call]/1 correctly authorize the snippet below to compile? J.A. Belloc (2019-10-14 19:36:11)
• Re: Does [expr.call]/1 correctly authorize the snippet below to compile? Krystian Stasiowski (2019-10-14 19:41:40)

Does [expr.call]/1 correctly authorize the snippet below to compile? J.A. Belloc (2019-10-10 13:08:21)

std::valarray<T>: deduction guide. Vladimir Grigoriev (2019-10-08 15:41:04)

• Re: std::valarray<T>: deduction guide. Andrew Schepler (2019-10-09 03:05:57)

Syntax of pointers to functions, members, and member functions John.Adriaan_at_[hidden] (2019-10-01 11:25:51)

• Re: Syntax of pointers to functions, members, and member functions Tadeus Prastowo (2019-10-01 20:23:29)
• Re: Syntax of pointers to functions, members, and member functions Andrew Tomazos (2019-10-02 07:31:48)

Re: Explicit instantiation declarations and requires clauses Christopher Head (2019-10-22 05:07:55)

Last message date: 2019-10-31 21:27:15