ISOCPP liaison List: by thread

[wg14/wg21 liaison] nullptr + 0 Robert Seacord (2023-10-26 12:29:43)

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] nullptr + 0 Jens Maurer (2023-10-26 12:41:18)
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] nullptr + 0 JeanHeyd Meneide (2023-10-26 12:59:54)
  - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] nullptr + 0 Thomas Köppe (2023-10-26 13:06:33)
    - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] nullptr + 0 Jonathan Wakely (2023-10-26 13:32:58)

[wg14/wg21 liaison] WG14 feelings about F-strings for C Niall Douglas (2023-10-25 19:34:56)

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] WG14 feelings about F-strings for C Joseph Myers (2023-10-25 20:26:06)
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] WG14 feelings about F-strings for C Niall Douglas (2023-10-26 11:50:25)
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] WG14 feelings about F-strings for C Martin Uecker (2023-10-25 20:52:16)
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] WG14 feelings about F-strings for C Jₑₙₛ Gustedt (2023-10-26 09:55:39)
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] WG14 feelings about F-strings for C Niall Douglas (2023-10-26 11:56:23)

[wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 meeting - 27th of October, 12:00 EDT/18:00 UTC+2 - part 2 Nina Dinka Ranns (2023-10-18 17:00:37)

[wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 meeting - 27th of October, 12:00 EDT/18:00 UTC+2 Nina Dinka Ranns (2023-10-18 16:53:45)

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 meeting - 27th of October, 12:00 EDT/18:00 UTC+2 Nina Dinka Ranns (2023-10-25 14:43:59)
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 meeting - 27th of October, 12:00 EDT/18:00 UTC+2 Nina Dinka Ranns (2023-10-27 18:50:29)
  - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 meeting - 27th of October, 12:00 EDT/18:00 UTC+2 Jens Gustedt (2023-10-27 19:52:45)
  - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 meeting - 27th of October, 12:00 EDT/18:00 UTC+2 Martin Uecker (2023-10-27 20:03:11)
    - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 meeting - 27th of October, 12:00 EDT/18:00 UTC+2 Cranmer, Joshua (2023-10-27 20:08:08)
      - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 meeting - 27th of October, 12:00 EDT/18:00 UTC+2 Martin Uecker (2023-10-27 20:45:04)

[wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 discussion on two proposed syntax options for WG21 Contracts Nina Dinka Ranns (2023-10-11 16:17:03)

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 discussion on two proposed syntax options for WG21 Contracts Nina Dinka Ranns (2023-10-16 10:30:43)
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 discussion on two proposed syntax options for WG21 Contracts Aaron Ballman (2023-10-16 14:02:39)
  - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 discussion on two proposed syntax options for WG21 Contracts Nina Dinka Ranns (2023-10-17 14:52:21)
    - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 discussion on two proposed syntax options for WG21 Contracts Timur Doumler (2023-10-27 16:00:04)
      - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 discussion on two proposed syntax options for WG21 Contracts Corentin (2023-10-27 16:02:41)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 discussion on two proposed syntax options for WG21 Contracts Corentin (2023-10-27 16:06:16)

[wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-05 11:58:51)

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Robert Seacord (2023-10-05 12:26:57)
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Aaron Ballman (2023-10-05 15:09:37)
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Niall Douglas (2023-10-05 16:04:07)
  - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Aaron Ballman (2023-10-05 16:25:09)
    - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker (2023-10-05 16:45:41)
      - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Aaron Ballman (2023-10-05 16:51:31)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker (2023-10-05 17:50:24)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen (2023-10-05 23:02:21)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker (2023-10-06 05:31:47)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen (2023-10-06 06:40:09)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Jₑₙₛ Gustedt (2023-10-06 12:48:51)
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker (2023-10-06 14:30:17)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-06 14:45:36)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker (2023-10-06 15:04:03)
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Niall Douglas (2023-10-06 07:59:47)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Jens Gustedt (2023-10-06 08:29:59)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen (2023-10-06 08:39:23)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Jens Gustedt (2023-10-06 08:54:01)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen (2023-10-06 09:07:32)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Jens Gustedt (2023-10-06 09:24:55)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen (2023-10-06 11:24:07)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Jₑₙₛ Gustedt (2023-10-06 12:35:30)
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-06 13:02:26)
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-06 13:09:26)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker (2023-10-06 14:53:58)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Jens Maurer (2023-10-06 15:15:23)
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-06 15:16:10)
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Joseph Myers (2023-10-09 23:02:48)
    - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? JeanHeyd Meneide (2023-10-05 16:48:09)
      - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker (2023-10-05 18:15:17)
      - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-06 13:35:28)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-06 13:43:31)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Aaron Ballman (2023-10-06 13:53:35)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-06 13:58:12)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Jens Maurer (2023-10-06 14:44:03)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Joseph Myers (2023-10-09 23:09:44)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Nina Dinka Ranns (2023-10-11 14:53:30)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-11 15:41:39)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Nina Dinka Ranns (2023-10-11 16:09:41)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Nina Dinka Ranns (2023-10-11 16:19:24)
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Aaron Ballman (2023-10-06 16:11:15)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-06 16:23:04)
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Jens Maurer (2023-10-06 16:24:06)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-06 16:27:16)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Jens Maurer (2023-10-06 16:28:49)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-06 16:32:12)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Jens Maurer (2023-10-06 16:35:50)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-06 16:56:39)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Aaron Ballman (2023-10-06 17:57:12)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker (2023-10-06 18:00:23)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Aaron Ballman (2023-10-06 18:14:18)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker (2023-10-06 18:40:23)
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker (2023-10-06 17:06:09)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-06 17:14:06)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker (2023-10-06 17:56:03)
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen (2023-10-08 13:49:40)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-08 16:06:18)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-06 14:06:34)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Robert Seacord (2023-10-06 14:28:52)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-06 14:32:23)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Robert Seacord (2023-10-06 14:45:49)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-06 15:44:26)
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-06 13:22:06)
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-07 09:24:16)
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker (2023-10-07 10:46:17)
  - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen (2023-10-07 11:38:47)
    - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Aaron Ballman (2023-10-07 12:52:17)
    - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker (2023-10-07 12:53:37)
      - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen (2023-10-07 13:10:16)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker (2023-10-07 13:25:45)
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-07 13:25:59)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker (2023-10-07 13:34:39)
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen (2023-10-07 13:38:59)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-07 13:46:05)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen (2023-10-07 14:13:49)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-07 14:21:32)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen (2023-10-07 14:29:34)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-07 14:31:45)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen (2023-10-07 14:37:45)
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-07 15:35:25)
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker (2023-10-08 06:17:39)
  - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-08 11:02:08)
    - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker (2023-10-08 13:41:16)
      - Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen (2023-10-08 14:13:44)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler (2023-10-08 16:22:47)
        
        Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen (2023-10-08 16:25:58)

Last message date: 2023-10-27 20:45:04